Then, there was this comment.
"Shifting the discussion to male victims is like trying to make a case for "reverse-racism." Fact is, males are less than 10% of the victims of domestic abuse and they certainly aren't murdered on a daily basis the way that women and girls are. Men commit 90% of the murders in this country, and most are against people they know."
Ummm....I don't even know where to start. To focus on this comment in particular, I have this:
1) Yes, the statistics are true...to a point. To be more specific, males are victims of less than 10% of REPORTED domestic abuse cases involving PHYSICAL VIOLENCE. It is impossible to argue that the statistics out there are accurate when
- Men have zero support when it comes to reporting domestic abuse against a women,
- Men are so stigmatized to report abuse because they are supposed to be the "stronger" sex,
- Abuse is not just physical violence, it is also mental, emotional and verbal abuse as well--which women are far more likely to use over physical hitting,
- And if it is verbal/emotional abuse, what evidence does the man have when it's all so arbitrary?
3) The part that bothers me the most is that the commenter compares male victims to reverse-racism. Which, again with the lists, made me think of a couple disturbing things.
- Suggesting that women should be excused from discussions about domestic abuse because they're reported as the victims more?
- Suggesting men CAN'T be a victim of domestic abuse?
- What about the other 10%? Shouldn't we, as people against domestic violence, make a case for ALL victims and not just the majority of them?
And that's why I want to write a thesis on stereotypes and males in the media. Boom. *bow*











